Krishnan v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge order where the applicant sought correction of errors in an impugned order. The court directed the registry to correct the Crime Number and the named police station in the order at specified paragraphs.
What did the court decide?
Directed the registry to correct the crime number to '148 of 2019' and the police station to 'SHO, Dhanvanthiri Nagar' in the order at specified paragraphs and furnish a fresh copy.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.4998 of 2021
Crl.O.P.No.4998 of 2021
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
The matter was posted under the caption “For Being Mentioned”
on the ground that the Crime Number and the Police Station have been
wrongly mentioned in several places in the order.
- (i) At paragraph No.3, the Crime Number shall be mentioned as 'Crime No.148 of 2019'.
(ii) At paragraph No.4, the Crime Number shall be mentioned as 'Crime No.148 of 2019'.
(iii) At paragraph No.5, the Crime Number shall be mentioned as 'Crime No.148 of 2019' and the Respondent/Police shall be mentioned as 'The Station House Officer, Dhanvanthiri Nagar Police Station, Gorimedu, Priyadharshini Nagar, Puducherry – 605 006'.
- Registry is directed to carry out the corrections immediately and furnish a fresh order copy to both sides.
19.04.2022
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application regarding correction of wrongly mentioned Crime Number and Police Station in the impugned order deserves acceptance.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
The Station House Officer, Dhanvanthiri Nagar Police Station, Gorimedu, Priyadharshini Nagar, Puducherry – 605 006
Coram
N. Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court