Allowed

B.Mubarak v. State Rep by

Madras HC22 Feb 2021CRL OP/3331/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. apprehending arrest for alleged IPC 420 offence. Court directed police to complete inquiry within four weeks without arresting petitioner if no prima facie case is found, before expedited closure of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Respondent police to complete inquiry within four weeks; no arrest to be made pending outcome; if prima facie case, register FIR or close inquiry.

B.Mubarak Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twenty Second day of February Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.3331 of 2021

¶7

B.MUBARAK [ PETITIONER ]

¶8

Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CRIMES, S.10 PALLIKARANAI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI 600 100.

¶9

CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2021.

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S.GOUHAR UN NISSA Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : M/S. S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 420 of IPC in Crime No.not known of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

¶16

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry in C.S.R.189 of 2021 is pending against the petitioner.

¶17

In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the respondent Police is directed to complete the enquiry, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, the respondent police shall register the First Information Report or close the petition enquiry. Till then, the respondent police is directed not to arrest the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Accordingly, this criminal original petition is closed.

¶19

-sd/-
22/02/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CRIMES
S 10 PALLIKARANAI POLICE STATION,
CHENNAI 600 100.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.GOUHAR UN NISSA Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.3331/2021
Date :22/02/2021
MN-09/03/2021

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Mubarak v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Mubarak v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Solomon Vs v.Devaraj

Palanisamy Vs State Rep.by

Prabu Vs State Rep.by

Imran Vs State Rep.by

G.Subramani Vs Deputy Superintendent of Police (Dsp)

Madeswaran Vs the Inspector of Police