Dismissed

P.Mylswami, M/A.62 Years v. State by

Madras HC10 Dec 2021CRL OP/29379/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Criminal Original Petition for quashing of a trial court proceeding was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a discharge petition. The petitioner's personal appearance before the trial court is dispensed with except for specific procedural steps.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file discharge petition granted; personal appearance dispensation granted.

P.Mylswami, M/A.62 Years Vs State by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 10.12.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

CRL.O.P.NO.29379 OF 2017 AND CRL.M.P.NOS.16602 & 16603 OF 2017

P.Mylswami

... Petitioner

Vs.

State by : The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruppur.

¶10

... Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.127 of 2017 pending trial on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Udumalpet and quash the same.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jayakumar

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an appropriate petition for discharge before the trial Court.

¶16

2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and the liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

3.At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court to grant an order dispensing with the personal appearance of the petitioner. Accordingly, the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is dispensed with, except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., passing of judgment, or on any other date as may be required by the trial Court.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

mkn

¶24

¶25

The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Udumalpet.

¶26

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruppur.

¶27

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶28

Crl.O.P.No.29379 of 2017

¶29

SMI(CO) RLP(27/12/2021)

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Mylswami, M/A.62 Years v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Mylswami, M/A.62 Years v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D. Venkataraman, 49 Yrs, Vs Sub Inspector of Police

Muralisundaram Vs State Rep. by Its

Dr.P.Elangovan, Vs The Inspector of Police

Mr.J.R.John Alexander Vs State Rep. by

Raj Padmanaban, 38 Yrs/M Vs the State Represented by

Mr.N.Palanisamy, Vs State by