The High Court of Madras dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR, recording that the petitioning counsel had sought to withdraw the matter via video conferencing.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected criminal miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 09.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
CRL. O.P. NO. 23047 OF 2017 AND CRL. M.P. NO.13406 OF 2017
Muralisundaram . . . Petitioner
Versus
PRAYER :
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime No.310 of 2017 dated 19.09.2017 on the file of 1st respondent police, Vepery, Chennai and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.B,Karthikeyan
For Respondents : Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 Mr.A.E.Lakshminarayanan for R2
ORDER
Learned counsel, who appears for the petitioner, through video conferencing, seeks permission of this court to withdraw the criminal original petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
psa/asr
To
+1cc to Mr.A.E.Lakshminarayanan, Advocate, S.R.No.65206
Crl. O.P. No. 23047 of 2017
AJS(CO) PM/27/12/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muralisundaram
State rep. by The Inspector of Police Central Crime Branch
The Manager Legal/Authorised Representative Redington (India) Limited
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
