Dismissed

Murali v. State Rep.by

Madras HC11 Feb 2021CRL OP/289/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice V.Bharathidasan dismissed the anticipatory bail petition. The court directed the police to complete the pending enquiry within four weeks, register FIR if a prima facie case exists, otherwise close the petition, and directed no arrest until completion.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete enquiry within four weeks; register FIR if prima facie case exists; no arrest allowed pending enquiry.

Murali Vs State Rep.by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 11.02.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.289 of 2021

Murali

...Petitioner

Vs.

State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvarur, Tiruvarur District.

¶10

...Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.(Not Known) of 2019 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Palanivel

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶14

ORDER

¶15

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶16

The petitioner, who is arrayed as Accused No.Rank Not Known, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 463 & 464 of IPC, in Crime No.Not Known of 2019, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police.

¶18

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner in Current Paper No.289 of 2019.

¶19

In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the respondent Police is directed to complete the enquiry, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and in the enquiry, if a prima facie case is made https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ out against the petitioner, the respondent police shall register the

¶20

First Information Report, otherwise close the petition. Till then, the respondent police is directed not to arrest the petitioner.

¶21

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶22

-sd/-

¶23

11/02/2021

¶24

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶25

TRUE COPY

¶26

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶27

¶28

1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, O/O.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUVARUR, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

¶29

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶30

+1 CC to M/S.N.PALANIVEL Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO. 1447

CRL OP.289/2021

Date :11/02/2021

MN-19/02/2021

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Murali v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murali v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raman Vs State Rep by

Ramasamy Vs State Rep by

Thangarasu Vs State by

Manivel Vs State Rep by

P.Kaliyappan Vs State Rep.by

B.Sathya Prakash Vs the Inspector of Police