Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., but the petition was dismissed after the learned counsel requested permission to withdraw it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.2656 of 2021
R.VEERASAMI @ VEERASAMY [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E-3 SARAVANAMPATTY POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE CITY. CR.NO.1987 OF 2020.
For Petitioner : M/S. B.BHUVANESHWARI Advocate
For Respondent : MR.T.SHANMUGA RAJESWARAN, Government Advocate (crl.side) For Intervener : M/S. L.SANTHOSH KUMAR, Advocate [IN CRL.MP.NO.3588/2021]
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned Counsel for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E-3 SARAVANAMPATTY POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE CITY.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S. B.BHUVANESHWARI Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.2656/2021
Date :24/03/2021
cs 07/04/2021
R.VEERASAMI @ VEERASAMY
THE STATE REP.BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
