Partly allowed

M.Arjunan v. State Rep.by

Madras HC23 Mar 2021CRL MP/3094/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court relaxed the condition imposed on an accused senior citizen suffering from chronic ailments and diabetes appearing before the trial court once every month. Considering the prevailing pandemic situation and the petitioner's health, the court modified the condition to appear once every three months starting from May 2021 until further orders.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed to appear once a month was relaxed; the petitioner is now required to appear once every three months on the first working day of the particular month at 10.30 a.m. starting from

M.Arjunan Vs State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3094 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL.A.No.101 of 2020

¶8

M.ARJUNAN [PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED]

¶9

Vs STATE REP.BY [RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CBI/ACB/CHENNAI. (RC.NO.MA.1/2007/A/0055)

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to

¶11

(i) To relax the conditions that he should report before the trial court at 10.30 a.m. on the first working day of every English Calendar Month imposed by order dated 13.02.2020 in Cr.M.P.No.1925 of 2020 in Crl.A.No.101 of 2020.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.RAVI, Advocate for the petitioner, and of MR.K.SRINIVASAN, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI-cases, on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner vide order dated 13.02.2020 in Crl.M.P.No.1925 of 2020 in Crl.A.No.101 of 2020 that the petitioner should appear before the Trial Court at 10.30 a.m. on the first working day of every English Calendar month until further orders.

¶14

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a senior citizen and Chronic Diabetic Patient and also suffering from various other ailments and thereby, he finds it difficult to appear before the Trial Court during the prevailing pandemic situation. He would further submit that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the condition. Hence, he seeks for relaxation.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Heard the learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases appearing for the respondent police.

¶17

Taking into consideration the above facts and submissions, the condition imposed on the petitioner by order dated 13.02.2020 in Crl.M.P.No.1925 of 2020 in Crl.A.No.101 of 2020 is modified to that the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court once in every three months on the first working day of the particular month at 10.30 a.m. starting from May 2021, until further orders.

¶18

-sd/-
23/03/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
CBI/ACB/CHENNAI.
2 THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR CBI CASES,
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
C.C. to M/S.M.RAVI Advocate on payment of necessary charges
Order
in
CRL MP.3094/2021
in
CRL A.101/2020
Date :23/03/2021
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶19

TA-30/03/2021

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Arjunan v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Arjunan v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thangasekar @ Sekar Vs the Inspector of Police

V. Arumugham Vs the Executive Magistrate Cum

G.Arockiadass Vs State Rep. by Its

Arunachalam Vs the Inspector of Police

Suresh Kumar @ Sura Vs State Rep by

Namasivayam Vs the Inspector of Police