Karthik R v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought modification of bail conditions imposed in a POCSO case where he could not produce a blood relative as a surety. Court allowed modification, removing the blood relative requirement while maintaining the bond amount.
What did the court decide?
The petition allowing execution of a bond for Rs. 10,000 with two sureties holding proper Aadhar cards, removing the requirement for a blood relative surety.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
Crl.O.P.No.24796 of 2021
R.Karthik, M/A 21 years, S/o.Rajasekar
...Petitioner
Vs.
State Rep. by, Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram.
Cr.No.10 of 2021. ...Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 439(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to modify the condition imposed upon the petitioner by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of cases under POCSO Act, Chengalpattu passed in Crl.M.P.No.834 of 2021 dated 28.10.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.Adithya Varadarajan
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condition requiring a bond with two sureties including a blood relative should be modified when the petitioner cannot produce a blood surety.
To what sum and with what nature of sureties the petitioner's bail bond should be conditioned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Karthik
- respondent
State
Coram
T.V. Thamilselvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court