Partly allowed

Ayyanar (Prakash) v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Dec 2021CRL MP/13434/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed to relax bail conditions imposing daily reporting. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted the petitioner complied with conditions. The Court modified the condition to require the petitioner to appear before the police authority once a month at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

What did the court decide?

The order to report daily at 10.30 a.m. is modified. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once a month at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

Ayyanar (Prakash) Vs Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Second day of December Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.13434 of 2021

IN CRL OP.19712/2021

AYYANAR (PRAKASH)

[ PETITIONER ]

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TIRUVANNAMALAI. CR.NO.25/2021.

¶12

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the conditions that the petitioner shall report before the respondent daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders imposed in Crl.O.P.No.19712 of 2021 order dated 27.10.2021.

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.A.S.ASWIN PRASANNA, Advocate for the petitioner, and of M/S.A.GOKULAKRISHNAN, Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶15

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.19712 of 2021 on 27.10.2021.

¶16

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is complying with the conditions regularly imposed by this Court.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Considering the said submission, the condition imposed on the petitioner is modified to that effect, that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police for monthly once at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

22/12/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO

¶24

1 THE SPECIAL COURT FOR EXCLUSIVE TRIAL OF CASES UNDER POCOS ACT, THIRUVANNAMALAI.

¶25

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

¶27

C.C. to M/S.A.S.ASWIN PRASANNA Advocate on payment of necessary charges

Order

in CRL MP.13434/2021

in CRL OP.19712/2021

Date :22/12/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶33

TA-04/01/2022

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ayyanar (Prakash) v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayyanar (Prakash) v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punitha Selvam Vs the State Rep. by

Asha Vs State Represent by

Kavi @ Kavinkumar Vs State Rep by Its

Mithun Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

A.Valliyammal Vs State Represented by

V.Narasimhan Vs the State Rep by