Dismissed

V.Kanakaraj, I.a.S, (Retd.), v. State Rep. by

Madras HC7 Dec 2021CRL OP/2462/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner withdrew the criminal original petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to raise pleas before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise all legal pleas before the trial court; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

V.Kanakaraj, I.a.S, (Retd.), Vs State Rep. by — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.2462 of 2017

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.2462 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos.1726 and 1731 of 2017

¶3

N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.

¶4

Today, the matter has come up under the caption “For Being Mentioned”.

¶5

2. While passing an order on 07.12.2021, this Court has directed to

¶6

dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner but the same has not been reflected in the order. In such view of the matter, the following paragraph should be incorporated as Paragraph No.3 in order dated 07.12.2021 in Crl.O.P.No.2462 of 2017:

¶7

“3. At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the

¶8

petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court to grant an order dispensing with the personal appearance of the petitioner. Accordingly, the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is dispensed with, except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., passing of judgment, or on any other date as may be required by the trial Court.”

¶9

Page No:1/5

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

Crl.O.P.No.2462 of 2017

¶12

N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.

¶13

msv

¶14

Registry is directed to incorporate the above paragraph in the order

¶15

dated 07 .12.2021 and issue fresh Order copy to the parties concerned.

¶16

10.01.2022

¶17

msv

¶18

Crl.O.P.No.2462 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos.1726 and 1731 of 2017

¶19

Page No:2/5

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Crl.O.P.No.2462 of 2017

¶22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶23

Dated: 07.12.2021

¶24

C O R A M

¶25

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶26

Crl. O.P. No.2462 of 2017 &

¶27

Crl.M.P.Nos.1726 & 1731of 2017

¶28

V.Kanakaraj ...Petitioner/ Accused 1

¶29

Versus

¶30

The State

¶31

Represented by the Inspector of Police G-7, Chetpet Police Station, Law and Order, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031 Crime No. 1249 of 2012

¶32

V.Vijayapoornima ...Respondents

¶33

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records and quash the legal proceedings in C.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the XIV Judical Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

¶34

For Petitioner ... Mr.V.R.Balasubramaniam

¶35

For Respondents ...

¶36

Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar

¶37

Government Advocate (Crl.side) for R ... No appearance for R2

¶38

Page No:3/5

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

Crl.O.P.No.2462 of 2017

¶41

O R D E R

¶42

Today, when the Criminal Original Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the criminal original petition with the liberty to raise all the legal pleas before the trial Court. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶43

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal original petition is dismissed as withdrawn and the liberty as sought for is granted. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions also closed.

07.12.2021

gpa/gba

XIV Judical Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

¶48

The Inspector of Police G-7, Chetpet Police Station, Law and Order, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031

¶49

The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court, Chennai

¶50

Page No:4/5

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

Crl.O.P.No.2462 of 2017

¶53

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J

¶54

gpa/gba

¶55

Crl. O.P. No.2462 of 2017 & Crl.M.P.Nos.1726 & 1731 of 2017

¶56

07.12.2021

¶57

Page No:5/5

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Kanakaraj, I.a.S, (Retd.), v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Kanakaraj, I.a.S, (Retd.), v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnan, M/a 65 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

Vetri Alias Vetri Murugesan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Mariappan, 52 Yrs, Vs the Inspector of Police

Mr.Manjunath Vs Mr.Satyanarayan Agarwal

S.Suresh, M/a 46 Years, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Sumathi K. Prashath (A3) Vs v. Palanisamy (Deceased) Rep.