Dismissed

Mariappan, 52 Yrs, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Dec 2021CRL OP/24797/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed of a Criminal Original Petition and connected miscellaneous petitions seeking quashing of a final report filed for offences under sections 294(b), 323, and 324 IPC. The Court dismissed the petition as the investigation was concluded and records sent to the trial court.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. The trial Court is directed to complete the trial expeditiously.

Mariappan, 52 Yrs, Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.12.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.24797 of 2017 and CRL.MP.Nos.14323 & 14324 of 2017

¶6

1.Mariappan

¶7

2.Palaniappan 3.Navanitha Krishnan 4.Tamilarasan ...Petitioners

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Inspector of Police Pallapatty Police Station, Salem District, C.C.No.32/2017

¶10

...Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the entire records in C.C.No.32 of 2017 now pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate II, Salem and Quash the same.

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.M.D.Ilayaraja For Respondent : Mr. Kishore Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This petition has been filed to quash the final report filed against the petitioner for the offence u/s.294(b), 323 & 324 IPC.

¶15

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners belonged to a political party and they have attacked the defacto complainant with a deadly weapon for destroying the banners kept in their area and besides he had also abused the complainant with unparliamentary words and criminally intimidated him. Hence the complaint.

¶16

3.Mr.R.Kishore Kumar, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the respondent police have already

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

completed the investigation in this matter and the records have been sent to the trial Court for conducting trial.

¶19

4.In view of the above statement so made by the learned Government Advocate, this Court is inclined to dismiss this petition to see to its logical end.

¶20

5.In the result, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. The trial Court is hereby directed to complete the trial as expeditiously as possible. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

¶21

s/dAssistant Registrar

¶22

//True Copy//

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶24

kas/dk To

¶25

The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Salem

¶26

Do Thro The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Salem

¶27

3.The Inspector of Police Pallapatty Police Station, Salem District.

¶28

4.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai.

¶29

+1 CC to Mr.R.Sasi Kumar, Advocate sr 65073.

¶30

CRL.O.P.No.24797 of 2017 &CRL.MP.Nos.14323 & 14324/2017

¶31

SP(22/12/2021)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mariappan, 52 Yrs, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mariappan, 52 Yrs, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.P.Sainaba, Aged 40 Years, Vs State Rep. by

Ponnupappa F/a 52 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

Gowtham Chand Sethiya, Vs the State Rep. by

R. Vinayagamurthy, Vs Seeyathammal

P.Thamizh, Aged 32 Years, Vs State Rep. by

Krishnan, M/a 65 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its