Malliga, they have defended for their clients and they have not at all entered into the property belonged to their clients. When there is no specific allegations against these petitioners namely lawyers, it is mockery to the judiciary in filing an FIR merely by a statement given by the complainant. Further, the petitioners being the lawyers, they have advised their client to approach the Revenue Authorities as contemplated under the Act or Rule and they have issued notice to the Special Tahsildar and to the Government under the instruction of their client namely K. Malliga and that does not mean that they have threatened the said Kalavathy, Selvam and Kannan. All along, the said Kalavathy, Selvam has been fighting for their right impleading the said K. Malliga as a defendant/respondent simultaneously, the petitioners' one K. Malliga also filed suit and Writ Petition against the said Kalavathy and Selvam. All of a sudden, the said Kannan entered into the scenario to create confusion in this regard without knowing the real facts of the issues. Based on the complaint given by the said Kannan, the respondent police has registered the case in Crime No.1816 of 2017 is an abuse of process of law and hence the Crime No.1816 of 2017 is liable to be quashed.
