Allowed

Srikanth v. State Rep.by

Madras HC7 Dec 2021CRL OP/23581/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Srkanth, in a police case alleging affray and assault. The Court imposed standard conditions including surrender within fifteen days, reporting to police, and non-interference with evidence or witnesses, referencing P.K. Shaji. Violation could lead to cancellation and fresh FIR u/s 229-A IPC.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail conditioned upon surrender within 15 days, weekly reporting, and non-interference with investigation or trial.

Srikanth Vs State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.23581 of 2021

¶6

Srikanth ...Petitioner

¶7

State Rep by ...Respondent The Inspector of Police, G-10, Anaicut Police Station, Chengalpattu. Crime No.275 of 2021.

¶8

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.275 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Muthukumar

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Suganthan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 341, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.275 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶13

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant relative's son, as a result of which, the petitioner along with other accused persons had abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked the defacto complainant and his relatives and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.

¶14

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that there is a case in counter and the petitioner had also given a complaint before the respondent police in Crime No.276 of 2021 as against the defacto complainant. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and the investigation is almost completed. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is almost completed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶18

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyur, Chengalpattu District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶19

(a) if the petitioner fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

¶20

(b) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶21

(c) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Wednesday at 10.30. a.m., until further orders.

¶22

(d) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶23

(e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶24

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

(g) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

¶27

-sd/-

¶28

07/12/2021

¶29

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶30

TRUE COPY

¶31

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO

¶32

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHEYYUR, CHENGALPATTU DISTRICT.

¶33

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶34

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶35

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, G-10, ANAICUT POLICE STATION, CHENGALPATTU.

¶36

+1 CC to M/S.R.MUTHUKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.14280

CRL OP.23581/2021

Date :07/12/2021

TA-14/12/2021

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Srikanth v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Srikanth v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Poomani Vs State Rep by

Sathishkumar @ Sathish Vs State Rep.by

R.Ramesh Vs the State Rep by

Guna Sekar Vs State Rep by

K.Ashokan Vs State Rep by

Haridass Vs the State Rep.by