Allowed

Guna Sekar v. State Rep by

Madras HC7 Dec 2021CRL OP/23572/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving assault and intimidation. The order imposed conditions including a security deposit, daily reporting to the police station, prohibition on tampering with evidence, and a bond executed with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon arrest subject to conditions including bond, security deposit, and daily reporting to police.

Guna Sekar Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :07.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.23572 of 2021

Guna Sekar

... Petitioner

Versus

State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Pudupettai Police Station, Cuddalore District, (Crime No. 809 of 2021)

¶10

... Respondent

¶11

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.809 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sathish Kumar

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences u/s.341, 294(b), 324 & 506(ii) of IPC, R/W Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, in Crime No.809 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

The case of the prosecution is that due to property dispute, the petitioner assaulted and threatened the defacto complainant. Hence, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint against the petitioners.

¶17

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation has been completed. He further submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶20

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶21

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No-II, Panruti, Cuddalore District on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶22

[a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of the Registered Advocate Clerk Association at Cuddalore District within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

¶23

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶24

[c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

¶25

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶26

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶27

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶30

-sd/-

¶31

07/12/2021

¶32

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶33

TRUE COPY

¶34

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶35

¶36

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, PANRUTI, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

¶37

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CUDDALORE [FOR INFORMATION]. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUPETTAI POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 5 THE REGISTERED ADVOCATE, CLERK ASSOCIATION, CUDDALORE. +1 CC to M/S M.SATHISH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.14173 CRL OP.23572/2021 Date :07/12/2021 JPA 14/12/2021

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Guna Sekar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guna Sekar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Poomani Vs State Rep by

Sathishkumar @ Sathish Vs State Rep.by

R.Ramesh Vs the State Rep by

K.Ashokan Vs State Rep by

Haridass Vs the State Rep.by

Srikanth Vs State Rep.by