Disposed

S.Sripriya v. State Rep by

Madras HC23 Nov 2021CRL OP/22230/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC sought police protection for a land surveyor. The Public Prosecutor stated the representation was not received by the police. The court directed the petitioner to furnish the complaint copy to the police and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to appear before the first respondent police and furnish the copy of the complaint for appropriate action.

S.Sripriya Vs State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.11.2021

¶2

CORAM:

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶4

CRL.O.P.No.22230 of 2021

¶5

S.Sripriya ... Petitioner

¶6

¶7

1.The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, S7-Madipakkam Police Station, Chennai.

¶8

2.The Land Surveyor, Sholinganallur, Chennai. 3.Ezhilarasi ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2021 and to provide necessary police protection to the second respondent to perform his statutory duty.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Krishnamoorthy For Respondent : Mr.E.Raj Thilak No.1 Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2021 and to provide necessary police protection to the second respondent to perform his statutory duty.

¶13

2.The grievance of the petitioner is that she has sent a representation dated 18.08.2021 seeking police protection, no action has been taken.

¶14

3.The Public Prosecutor submits that the respondent police has not received the petitioner's representation. He further submits that the petitioner sent it by the registered post and she has also got the proof of the same. Any how, the complaint is presently not available with the first respondent police. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

4.In view of the same, the petitioner is directed to

¶16

appear before the first respondent police and furnish the copy of the complaint. Thereafter, the first respondent police to take appropriate action.

¶17

5.With the above direction, the Criminal Original

¶18

Petition is disposed of.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

ata/sms

¶24

¶25

1.The Inspector of Police,

¶26

S7-Madipakkam Police Station, Chennai.

¶27

2.The Land Surveyor, Sholinganallur, Chennai.

¶28

3.The Public Prosecutor,

¶29

High Court, Madras.

¶30

+1 cc to Mr.D.Krishnamoorthy, Advocate Sr.NO. 60424

¶31

CRL.O.P.No.22230 of 2021

¶32

BS(CO)

¶33

A.SK(06.12.2021)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Sripriya v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sripriya v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhan Saheb Vs the State of Tamil Nadu Repby

R.Adhisaya Deisi Sheela Vs State Rep by

Ganesan Vs the State

S.Pandian Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Meera Vs the Superintendent of Police

S.Muthusamy Vs the Commissioner of Police