Pugazh v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras disposed of a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The Court directed the respondents to complete the police inquiry within two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Direction to complete inquiry within two weeks; Petition disposed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.22108 of 2021
PUGAZH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, (CRIME), S-15, SELAIYUR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI600 073. CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2021
[ RESPONDENT ]
For Petitioner : M/S.M.SASIKUMAR Advocate
For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Government Advocate, (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave for grant of anticipatory bail can be sought via Criminal Original Jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PUGAZH
- respondent
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, (CRIME), S-15, SELAIYUR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI
Coram
T.V. THAMILSELVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court