Allowed

Ranjith v. State Rep.by

Madras HC22 Nov 2021CRL MP/11912/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the High Court relaxed the daily reporting condition imposed on the petitioner regarding a bail order dated 21.06.2021. Considering the investigation was complete, the court ordered monthly appearances instead.

What did the court decide?

Daily reporting condition relaxed; replaced with requirement to appear before police on the first Tuesday of every month.

Ranjith Vs State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twenty Second day of November Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.11912 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.10621/2021

¶8

1 RANJITH 2 SAKTHIVEL

¶9

[ PETITIONERS ]

¶10

¶11

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMBUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUPATHUR DISTRICT. CR.NO.182/2021.

¶12

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.10621 of 2021 dated 21/06/2021 and thus render justice.

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.G.VINODH KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶15

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.11912 of 2021 on 21.06.2021.

¶16

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Considering the said submission and the investigation has been completed, the condition imposed on the petitioner is relaxed. However, the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police first Tuesday of every month.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

22/11/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AMBUR

¶26

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE [FOR INFORMATION]

¶27

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMBUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUPATHUR DISTRICT.

¶28

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶29

+1 C.C. to M/S.G.VINODH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.13253

Order

in CRL MP.11912/2021

in CRL OP.10621/2021

Date :22/11/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶35

APN 24/11/2021

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ranjith v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjith v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramachandiran @ Ramu Vs the State Rep by.

Shankar Vs the State Rep by

M.Kannan Vs State Rep by

Vijay Vs the State Rep by

S.Maheswari Vs State Rep by

Gaja@Gajendran Vs State Rep.by