Sathishkumar v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. but counsel withdrew the petition with the Court's permission, resulting in dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with permission of the Court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Ninth day of February Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.21053 of 2020
SATHISHKUMAR [PETITIONER/SINGLE ACCUSED] Vs STATE REP BY, [RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MAMALLAPURAM, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.
For Petitioner : M/S.N.RAJESHKANNAN Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.M.PRABHAVATHI Additional Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
- In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sathishkumar
- respondent
State Rep by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Mamallapuram, Kanchepuram District
Coram
V. Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court