Sankar v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Bench granted that petitioners execute own bond and appear before Judicial Magistrate as summons were issued, considering connected case bail history.
What did the court decide?
Directed petitioners to appear before Judicial Magistrate, Tiruttani and execute own bond as directed by the learned Judicial Magistrate.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 08.02.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Crl.O.P.No.202 of 2021
- Sankar 2. Manikandan 3. Venkatesan 4. Kanniyappan 5. Jagadesh 6 Venkatesan 7. Thirumalai 8. Jayanthi 9. Malar 10.Bakiyam 11.Karthick 12. Manjula 13. Narayanan 14. Giri ... Petitioners Vs.
State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Kanakamma Chatram Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.47 of 2017) .. Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioners on Anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.47 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police concerned in P.R.C.No.12/2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Thiruttani on their own bond to secure ends of justice.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan,
Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners apprehending arrest for offenses under Sections 147,148,324,307,458,459,460,506(2) of IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sankar and others
- respondent
State
Coram
V BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court