Allowed

Anand Kumar Parakh v. State Rep. by

Madras HC5 Feb 2021CRL OP/20994/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three-petitioner defence counsel sought interim inter-state anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC against arrest proceedings in Rajasthan. The Court granted bail for four weeks, conditional upon surrender in Chennai and filing an appeal in Rajasthan within two weeks, failing which the bail would stand cancelled.

What did the court decide?

Interim inter-state anticipatory bail granted for four weeks, subject to surrender and filing appropriate relief in Rajasthan within two weeks.

Anand Kumar Parakh Vs State Rep. by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 05.02.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.20994 of 2020

¶6

1.Anand Kumar Parakh 2.Sunil Kumar 3.Urmila Jain 4.Komal Jain ... Petitioners -Versus1.Inspector of Police, Nokha Police Station, Bikaner District, Rajasthan 334803 [Crime No.386 of 2020] 2.Inspector of Police, G-5, Secretariat Colony Police Station, Kilpauk, Chennai 600012. ... Respondents

¶7

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code praying to enlarge the petitioners on interim anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.386 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of the 1st respondent.

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.R.Shankar

¶9

For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Karthikeyan

¶10

Addl. Public Prosecutor

¶11

¶12

O R D E R (This case has been heard through video conference)

¶13

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners to enlarge them on interim / transit anticipatory bail in the event of arrest by the respondents in Crime No.386 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of the 1st respondent police.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that a false complaint has been given against the petitioners and they have nothing to do with the said allegations. He further submitted that Interstate Anticipatory bail may be granted to them to enable them to move the appropriate jurisdictional Court for necessary https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ relief.

¶15

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would, on instructions, submit that the concerned respondent has no intention to arrest the petitioners, however, on instructions he would further submit that there is a case pending against the petitioners on the file of the 1st respondent.

¶16

Taking into consideration that there is an apprehension of arrest by the 1st respondent, this Court is inclined to grant inter-state interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶17

Accordingly, interim interstate anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners for a period of four weeks, on condition that the petitioners shall surrender before the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and the each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate. Further, within two weeks from the date of execution of bail bond, the petitioners shall approach the competent jurisdictional Court in the State of Rajasthan and seeks appropriate relief failing which, this order of anticipatory bail shall automatically get cancelled.

¶18

-sd/05/02/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶19

¶20

1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE NO.II, EGMORE, CHENNAI.

¶21

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI [FOR INFORMATION]

¶22

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NOKHA POLICE STATION, BIKANER DISTRICT, RAJASTHAN - 334 803.

¶25

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, G-5, SECRETARIAT COLONY POLICE STATION, KILPAUK, CHENNAI - 600 012.

¶26

CC to M/S.R.SHANKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶27

CRL OP.20994/2020
Date :05/02/2021
MK:16/02/2021

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Anand Kumar Parakh v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Kumar Parakh v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar Vs State Rep. by

S.Santhosh Vs the State Rep.by Its

Pichaimani Vs State Rep.by

Sathish Vs State Rep by

S.Surya Vs State Rep by

Tae Hyup Kim Vs State Rep by