The High Court dismissed a petition for anticipatory bail as it stood no longer open for adjudication since the petitioner had already been arrested and remanded to judicial custody prior to the hearing.
Petition for anticipatory bail closed; connected CrL.M.P. also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION NO.20916 OF 2020
AND CRL.MP.NO.304 OF 2021 RAJ BHARATH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE [ RESPONDENT ] G-1, VEPERY POLICE STATION, CHENNAI. CRIME NO.1504 OF 2020 For Petitioner : M/S.R.C.PAUL KANAGARAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR. S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
[This case has been heard through video conference]
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police in connection with a case in Crime No.1504 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable u/s 294(b), 406, 420, 506(i) of IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.
-sd/-
24/03/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
G-1, VEPERY POLICE STATION,
CHENNAI.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.R.C.PAUL KANAGARAJ Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL.OP.NO.20916 OF 2020
& CRL.MP.NO.304 OF 2021
Date :24/03/2021
MK:27/04/2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail survives given that the petitioner had already been arrested and remanded to judicial custody.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAJ BHARATH
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
