Disposed

C.Kumar v. Statr by

Madras HC24 Mar 2021CRL OP/20906/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case involving offences including rioting and cheating. The respondent prosecutor withdrew arrest as the final report was against a different person and action against petitioners was dropped. The court closed the petition based on this submission.

What did the court decide?

Closed the anticipatory bail petition after the prosecutor confirmed no action was required against the petitioners.

C.Kumar Vs Statr by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20906 of 2020

¶7

1 C.KUMAR [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 M.MUNIKKANNU 3 S.VENNILA 4 A.VIMALA Vs

¶8

STATR BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ULUNDURPET,VILLUPPURAM DISTRICT. CR NO.19/2020.

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.ADITHYA VARADARAJAN Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : MR. S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

[This case has been heard through Video Conference]

¶14

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police in connection with a case registered in Crime No.19 of 2020 for the offence punishable u/s 147, 420, 465, 494, 496 and 294(b) of IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that though the FIR was initially registered as against Raman, Kumar, Munikannu, Vennila and Vimala, after investigation, final report has been filed only as against Raman and action as against these petitioners, who were arrayed as A2 to A4 has been dropped. Therefore, the petitioners are not wanted by the said police in connection with the allegations made in the FIR.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Recording the said submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

24/03/2021

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
ULUNDURPET,VILLUPPURAM DISTRICT.
CC to M/S.ADITHYA VARADARAJAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.20906/2020
Date :24/03/2021
RVR 20/04/2021

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Kumar v. Statr by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Kumar v. Statr by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja Vs the State Rep.by

B.Yamuna Vs State Rep.by Its

Ponnusamy Vs the Inspector of Police

Balan Vs State Rep.by

Sankar Vs State Rep by

Raj Bharath Vs the Inspector of Police