Gowtham v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Original Petition allowing anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of theft under IPC 379. The Court granted bail subject to conditions including a monetary deposit for school improvement and regular police reporting.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail in event of arrest, conditioned on surrender within 15 days, executing a bond, and making a non-refundable deposit of Rs. 10,000 for school rehabilitation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twenty Ninth day of October Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20385 of 2021
GOWTHAM
[ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C-4, PENNALURPET POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.310/2021)
For Petitioner : M/S M.VINOTH Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a theft case where there are no previous pending cases against him.
Whether the petitioner can condition his bail on making a deposit for the improvement of Government Schools.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
GOWTHAM
- respondent
STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Coram
M.DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court