Partly allowed

Sankar v. State

Madras HC28 Oct 2021CRL MP/10561/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge of the Madras High Court relaxed a bail condition requiring the petitioners to report to the police station daily, modifying it to require appearance only on every Monday until the filing of the charge sheet. The court was satisfied that the petitioners were complying with the original conditions.

What did the court decide?

The condition of daily appearance was modified to require appearance only on Mondays at 10.30 a.m. until the charge sheet is filed.

Sankar Vs State — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.10561 of 2021

IN CRL OP.16702/2021

1 SANKAR

[ PETITIONERS ]

2 VENKATESAN

3 VINOTHKUMAR

STATE THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, B-2, TIRUVALLUR TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUVALLUR.

¶14

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶15

CR.NO.419 OF 2021.

¶16

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition the petitioner shall Report before the Respondent Police daily at 10.30 am until further orders imposed by this Honble Court dated 13.09.2021 in Crl.O.P.No.16702 of 2021 in Cr.No.419/2021 and pass such further or other orders

¶17

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.GOMATHI, Advocate for the petitioner, and of MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶18

Vide order dated 13.09.2021, this Court had enlarged the petitioners on bail on certain conditions. This petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking relaxation of the conditions.

¶19

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.SIde) appearing for the respondent, on instruction, submits that the petitioners have been complying with the conditions without fail.

¶20

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer as sought for by the petitioners could be acceded to.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed by order dated 13.09.2021 alone stands modified and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police every Monday at 10.30 a.m till filing charge sheet. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶23

-sd/-

¶24

28/10/2021

¶25

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶26

TRUE COPY

¶27

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶28

¶29

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, PONNERI, THIRUVALLUR.

¶30

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVALLUR. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶31

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶32

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, B-2, TIRUVALLUR TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUVALLUR.

¶33

C.C. to M/S.R.GOMATHI Advocate on payment of necessary charges

Order

in CRL MP.10561/2021

in CRL OP.16702/2021

Date :28/10/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶39

TA-10/11/2021

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sankar v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sankar v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Kumar Vs State Rep by

Sumeer @ Vikramathithan Vs State Rep by

Krishnamoorthy Vs Inspector of Police

Harish Sehgal Vs Drugs Inspector, Thiruvallur

M/S.Kathir Kaman Jewels Private Ltd. Vs the Deputy Director of Income Tax

Ajeesh M.B Vs the State Rep.by