Allowed

Subasri v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Madras HC5 Feb 2021CRL MP/535/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous petition seeking relaxation of a bail condition requiring daily reporting to police. The court allowed relaxations of the fixed reporting time, observing it requires appearance whenever directed by authorities, noting the petitioner's regular compliance.

What did the court decide?

The condition of reporting daily at 10.30 a.m. is relaxed; the petitioner must appear before the police as and when required.

Subasri Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Fifth day of February Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.535 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.19056/2020

¶8

SUBASRI [ PETITIONER ]

¶9

Vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANALMEDU POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT. CR.NO.1011/2020.

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition of reporting before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders imposed by this Honble Court in its order dated 11.12.2020 in Crl.OP.No.19056 of 2020.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. S.SELVATHIRUMUUGAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶13

This petition is filed to relax the condition of reporting before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders imposed by this Court in its order dated 11.12.2020 in Crl.O.P.No.19056 of 2020 on the file of this Court.

¶14

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶15

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner is regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.19056 of 2020 dated 11.12.2020.

¶16

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.19056 of 2020 dated 11.12.2020, is relaxed, however the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶19

-sd/-
05/02/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
MAYILADUTHURAI
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
NAGAPATTINAM(FOR INFORMATION)
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
MANALMEDU POLICE STATION,
NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.
C.C. to M/S. S.SELVATHIRUMUUGAN Advocate on payment of
necessary charges
Order
in
CRL MP.535/2021
in
CRL OP.19056/2020
Date :05/02/2021
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
RVR 12/02/2021

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Subasri v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subasri v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar Vs State Rep. by

S.Santhosh Vs the State Rep.by Its

Pichaimani Vs State Rep.by

Sathish Vs State Rep by

S.Surya Vs State Rep by

Tae Hyup Kim Vs State Rep by