Allowed

Lakshmipathy v. State Rep by

Madras HC11 Nov 2021CRL OP/20132/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted anticipatory bail to Lakshmipathy, a 71-year-old accused in a land grabbing case involving cheating and forgery. The court noted no prior case history and the co-accused's bail, ordering release subject to execution of a bond, appearance requirements, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or absconding, citing P.K.Shaji.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail conditioned upon execution of a bond for Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, appearance before police and magistrate, and abstention from tampering with evidence or witn

Lakshmipathy Vs State Rep by — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Eleventh day of November Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs Justice TV. THAMILSELVI

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20132 of 2021

¶7

LAKSHMIPATHY [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶8

¶9

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT ANTI LAND GRABBING SPECIAL BRANCH, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 27/2020.

¶10

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶11

For Petitioner : M/S. T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Counsel for Government Advocate,

¶13

(Crl.Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶15

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶16

ORDER

¶17

(The case has been heard through video conferencing)

¶18

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 417, 419, 420, 468, 471 of IPC in Crime No.27 of 2020, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶19

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant had purchased a house site to an extent of 1240 sq.ft. Situated at Perumal Pattu Village, Thiruvallur Taluk and District by way of sale deed dated 16.02.2009. The petitioner along with other accused had created bogus ID of the defacto complainant and using this ID, they impersonated and conveyed the vacant site of the defacto complainant. Hence, this complaint has been lodged.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is aged about 71 years and he is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submitted that co-accused/Sampath, who is the document writer, had granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.7380 of 2021 on 08.03.2021. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶22

4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) raised objections and submitted that, by creating forged ID of the defacto complainant, the petitioner along with other accused impersonated and conveyed the vacant land of the defacto complainant. The petitioner is the witness of the power of attorney. He further submitted that the investigation is still pending. There is no previous case against the petitioner.

¶23

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that there is no previous case against the petitioner and the co-accused was granted bail by this Court, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶24

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvallur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer, who intends to arrest (or) to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶25

(a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶26

(b) the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶27

¶28

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶31

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

¶32

-sd/-

¶33

11/11/2021

¶34

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶35

TRUE COPY

¶36

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)

¶37

High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶38

¶39

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,

¶40

NO.II, THIRUVALLUR.

¶41

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶42

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶43

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT ANTI LAND GRABBING SPECIAL BRANCH, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

¶44

+1 CC to M/S. T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.12739

¶45

CRL OP.20132/2021

¶46

Date :11/11/2021 RW 15/11/2021

¶47

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Lakshmipathy v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakshmipathy v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Vishwa Vs the State Rep by

Neethithayalan Vs the State Rep by

Senthil Kumar Vs State Rep by

Vedanayagam Vs State Rep by

S.Palanisamy Vs State Rep by

Asokan Vs State Rep by