Allowed

Vedanayagam v. State Rep by

Madras HC11 Nov 2021CRL MP/11471/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted a request to relax an existing bail condition, modifying the requirement for the petitioner to appear before the investigating police officer every Monday without altering other conditions.

What did the court decide?

The condition for appearance before the respondent police in the 1st week of every month on Monday at 10.30 a.m. stands modified; all other conditions remain unaltered.

Vedanayagam Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Eleventh day of November Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.11471 of 2021

¶7

¶8

CRL OP.4529/2021

¶9

VEDANAYAGAM [ PETITIONER ]

¶10

¶11

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J3 POLICE STATION, GUINDY, CHENNAI (CRIME NO.51/2021)

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition in para 4 imposed by this Honble Court in Crl.M.P.No.7160/2021 vide order dated 29/07/2021 in Crl.OP.No.4529/2021.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S S.XAVIER FELIX, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶14

Vide Order dated 29.07.2021 in Crl.M.P.No.7160 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.4529 of 2021 modified the conditions imposed by the petitioner. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking relaxation of the conditions.

¶15

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instruction, submits that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions without fail.

¶16

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer as sought for by the petitioner could be acceded to.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed by order dated 29.07.2021 alone stands modified and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police in the 1^st week of every month on Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

11/11/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE IX METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE SAIDAPET, CHENNAI

¶26

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI(FOR INFORMATION)

¶27

3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J3 POLICE STATION, GUINDY, CHENNAI

¶28

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶29

+2 C.C. to M/S S.XAVIER FELIX Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.12671

Order

in CRL MP.11471/2021

in CRL OP.4529/2021

Date :11/11/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶35

RVR 15/11/2021

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Vedanayagam v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vedanayagam v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Vishwa Vs the State Rep by

Neethithayalan Vs the State Rep by

Senthil Kumar Vs State Rep by

Lakshmipathy Vs State Rep by

S.Palanisamy Vs State Rep by

Asokan Vs State Rep by