Karthik v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
This order is a one-line disposal where the Criminal Original Petition seeking anticipatory bail was dismissed as withdrawn, following a request posted on the registry.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 12.02.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN
Crl.O.P.No.20117 of 2020
Karthik ... Petitioner
Vs. Inspector of Police, ... Respondent Vepankuppam Police Station, Vellore Dt. (Crime No.01 of 2015)
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.01 of 2015 on the file of respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Nirmal Krishnan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Addl. Public Prosecutor O R D E R
(The case has been heard through video conference)
The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 174 of Cr.P.C. @ 302, 201 of I.P.C. in Crime No.01 of 2015, seeks anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Karthik
- respondent
Inspector of Police, Vepankuppam Police Station
Coram
V. Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court