Kumar v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court heard a criminal original petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. Relying on the submission that no petition or enquiry is pending, the court closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Original Petition No.19992 of 2020 for anticipatory bail is closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Second day of February Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19992 of 2020
KUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAILAM POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2020)
For Petitioner : M/S.A.E.LAKSHMI NARAYANAN Advocate For Respondent : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC in Crime No.not known of 2020, seeks anticipatory bail.
- Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that there is no petition or enquiry is pending against the petitioner.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. stands closed on the submission that no pending petition or enquiry exists against the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KUMAR
- respondent
STATE
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court