Ayyadurai Pandian Murugan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Criminal…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Seventh day of April Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19519 of 2020
1 AYYADURAI PANDIAN MURUGAN A [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 U.THIRUSELVI 3 U.PERIYANAYAKKI Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] SUPERINTENDENT/APPRAISER/ SENIOR INTELLIGENT OFFICER, DGGI CHENNAI ZONAL UNIT, CHENNAI. CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2020 For Petitioner : M/S B.ARVIND SREVATSA Advocate For Respondent : M/S. N.P.KUMAR, Special Public Prosecutor for GST Cases PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
2.Recording the above submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
-sd/07/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE SUPERINTENDENT/APPRAISER/
SENIOR INTELLIGENT OFFICER,
DGGI CHENNAI ZONAL UNIT,
CHENNAI.
2 THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
FOR GST CASES, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S B.ARVIND SREVATSA Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.19519/2020
Date :07/04/2021
cs 28/04/2021
Ayyadurai Pandian Murugan A
U. Thiruselvi
U. Periyanayakki
State Rep By Superintendent/Appraiser/Senior Intelligent Officer, DGGI Chennai Zonal Unit, Chennai
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court