Dismissed

D.Ezhilarasi @ Meena v. State Rep. by

Madras HC7 Apr 2021CRL MP/8015/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed three criminal miscellaneous petitions seeking relaxation of bail conditions. The petitioner was a habitual offender who failed to comply with previous bail orders due to arrest in a separate crime. The court denied relaxation and ordered daily appearance before the Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitions dismissed. Petitioner directed to appear before Judicial Magistrate, Karaikal, daily at 05:30 p.m. until further orders.

D.Ezhilarasi @ Meena Vs State Rep. by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Seventh day of April Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NOS.8015, 8016 AND 8018 OF 2020 IN CRL.O.P.NOS.10524, 14440 AND 14472 OF 2020

¶7

D.EZHILARASI @ MEENA [ PETITIONER

¶8

IN ALL THE PETITIONS ] Vs STATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENT SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IN CRL.MP.NO.8015 OF 2020 KARAIKAL TOWN POLICE STATION, IN CRL.OP.NO.10524 OF 2020 ] KARAIKAL. (CRIME NO.244 OF 2020). STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IN CRL.MP.NO.8016 OF 2020 NERAVY POLICE STATION, IN CRL.OP.NO.14472 OF 2020 ] KARAIKAL, PONDICHERRY (CRIME NO.83 OF 2020) STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IN CRL.MP.NO.8018 OF 2020 NERAVY POLICE STATION, IN CRL.OP.NO.14440 OF 2020 ] KARAIKAL, PONDICHERRY. (CRIME NO.82 OF 2020)

¶9

Petitions praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to

¶10

[i] relax the conditional order “(b) the petitioner shall stay at Pondicherry and report before the D.Nagar Police Station, Pondicherry daily at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m, until further orders”., dated 07.09.2020 imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.4709 of 2020 in CRL.OP.NO.10524 of 2020 [IN CRL.MP.NO.8015 OF 2020 IN CRL.OP.NO.10524 OF 2020]

¶11

[ii] relax the conditional order “(b) the petitioner shall stay at Pondicherry and report before the D.Nagar Police Station, Pondicherry daily at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m, until further orders”., dated 29.10.2020 imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.14472 of 2020 [IN CRL.MP.NO.8016 OF 2020 IN CRL.OP.NO.14472 OF 2020] https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

[iii] relax the conditional order “(b) the petitioner shall stay at Pondicherry and report before the D.Nagar Police Station, Pondicherry daily at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m, until further orders”., dated 29.10.2020 imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.14440 of 2020 [IN CRL.MP.NO.8018 OF 2020 IN CRL.OP.NO.14440 OF 2020]

¶13

Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. R.VIVEKANANTHAN, Advocate [IN ALL THE PETITIONS] for the petitioner, and of MR. D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR (PUDUCHERRY) [IN ALL THE PETITIONS] on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶14

Earlier, this Court had imposed certain conditions on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.Nos.10524, 14440 and 14472 of 2020, dated 07.09.2020 and 29.10.2020 respectively. However, the petitioner was arrested in another crime number and therefore, she has not complied with the conditions imposed by this Court, for which, this Court by an order dated 17.12.2020, suspended the said conditions for a period of eight weeks and further directed that the petitioner shall not enter into the jurisdiction limits of Karaikal, until further orders.

¶15

In view of the fact that the petitioner is a habitual offender, as evident from the above submission, this Court is not inclined to relax the conditions imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.Nos.10524, 14440 and 14472 of 2020, dated 07.09.2020 and 29.10.2020. These Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. Further, the petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, cum Additional District Munsif Court, Karaikal, daily at 05.30 p.m., until further orders.

¶16

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶17

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,
CUM-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF COURT,
KARAIKAL.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
PONDICHERRY [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PONDICHERRY.
4 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KARAIKAL TOWN POLICE STATION,
KARAIKAL,
5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
NERAVY TOWN POLICE STATION,
KARAIKAL, PONDICHERRY.
6 THE OFFICER INCHARGE
D.NAGAR POLICE STATION,
PONDICHERRY.
C.C. to M/S. R.VIVEKANANTHAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
Order
in
Crl.M.P.Nos.8015, 8016 and 8018 of 2020
in
Crl.O.P.Nos.10524, 14440 and 14472 of 2020
Date :07/04/2021
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
MK:19/05/2021

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Ezhilarasi @ Meena v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Ezhilarasi @ Meena v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Kamaraj, Vs the Deputy Commissioner of

Trichirappalli Sarvodaya Vs the Presiding Officer

The Karur District Co-Op. Vs the Regional Provident Fund

Ayyadurai Pandian Murugan Vs State Rep by

Arsath Ali Vs the Inspector of Police

Aadhil Mon Vs State Rep by