Akbar Ali v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. facing trial for IPC offenses after defaulting in court due to alleged illness. Court rejected bail, ordering surrender.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to surrender to the trial court and file a petition for recalling the NBW.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Second day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20623 of 2020
AKBAR ALI [PETITIONER/ACCUSED]
Vs
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CRIME BRANCH CID, NAGAPATTINAM UNIT, NAGAPATTINAM. (CRIME NO. 3/2020)
[RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT]
For Petitioner : M/S S.SHANKAR Advocate
For Respondent : M/S. S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner facing a jumped bail situation due to illness and pandemic restrictions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AKBAR ALI
- respondent
STATE
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court