Disposed

D.Jayaprakash v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Sept 2021CRL OP/16230/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, in an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., noticing facts suggesting police harassment without FIR registration, directed the police to complete the enquiry or register/close the case within two weeks, acting as an alternative to immediate bail.

What did the court decide?

Director police to conduct enquiry, register F.I.R., or close petition within two weeks.

D.Jayaprakash Vs Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Tuesday, the Seventh day of September Two Thousand Twenty One

¶3

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶4

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.16230 of 2021

¶5

D.JAYAPRAKASH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶6

¶7

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE [ RESPONDENT ] T-13, KUNDRATHUR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI-600 069.

¶8

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN.

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S. P.VISHNU Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : MR. A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioner who was arrested for the offence under Section 420 of I.P.C. in Cr.No.not known of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant.

¶15

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent police is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent police is directed to conduct the enquiry and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register the F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order/uploading of the order in the Website. The parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

07/09/2021

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶23

¶24

1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶25

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE T-13, KUNDRATHUR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI-600 069.

¶26

CC to M/S. P.VISHNU Advocate on payment of necessary charges

CRL OP.16230/2021

Date :07/09/2021

RW 24/09/2021

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Jayaprakash v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Jayaprakash v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thangavel Vs State Rep by

Shoodesh Vs State Rep by

Hari Vs the State Rep by

G.Natarasan Vs the State Rep.by

K.Rajendran Vs State Rep by

Rajasekar Vs the State Rep.by