Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding allegations under Section 380 IPC. The respondent prosecutor submitted no petition or enquiry was pending, leading the court to close the petition without granting bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Third day of February Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.1453 of 2021
V.SANDHIYA [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THAMBARAM ( CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN)
For Petitioner : M/S. M.R.THANGAVEL Advocate
For Respondent : MR.S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 380 of IPC, in Crime No.Not known of 2020, seeks anticipatory bail.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THAMBARAM.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CRL OP.1453/2021
Date :03/02/2021
cs 19/02/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.SANDHIYA
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THAMBARAM
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
