Disposed

A.Raajendher v. State Rep by

Madras HC5 Aug 2021CRL OP/13708/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras addressed a petition for anticipatory bail. The petitioner alleged police harassment under the guise of an enquiry, while the State claimed an enquiry was pending. The Court directed the Police to conduct the enquiry and either register an FIR, close the petition, or report within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent Police to conduct the enquiry and report/register FIR/close petition within two weeks.

A.Raajendher Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Fifth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13708 of 2021

¶7

A.RAAJENDHER [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶8

¶9

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, V-3, J.J.NAGAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI (CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2021)

¶10

For Petitioner : MR.ABRAR MOHAMMAD ABDULLAH Advocate for

¶11

For Respondent : M/S. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner who was arrested for the offence under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C. in Cr.No.not known of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant.

¶16

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent police is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent police is directed to conduct the enquiry and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register the F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order/uploading of the order in the Website. The parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

05/08/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, V-3, J.J.NAGAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI

¶26

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶27

+1 CC to M/S.P.S.MURALIDHARA RAO Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.8197

¶28

Date :05/08/2021

¶29

APN 13/08/2021

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Raajendher v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Raajendher v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.K.Dilip Kumar Vs State Rep by

Khader Humayun Vs the State Rep by

Govindasamy Vs State Rep by

Yugaselvan Vs Renuka

Varatharajan Vs the State Rep by

Gopinath Vs State Rep.by