Allowed

Gopinath v. State Rep.by

Madras HC5 Aug 2021CRL OP/13677/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of illegal possession of tobacco products under COTPA and IPC. The order mandates a non-refundable deposit of Rs.25,000 for school rehabilitation and strict reporting conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to surrender within 15 days, executing a bond with sureties, reporting daily, and making a non-refundable deposit of Rs.25,000 for school improvement.

Gopinath Vs State Rep.by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Fifth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13677 of 2021

¶7

GOPINATH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶8

¶9

STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, M-6, MANALI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI. CR.NO.676 OF 2021.

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S. K.THENRAJAN Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : M/S. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 24(1) of COTPA Act and 328 of IPC in Crime No.676 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of pan masala and Gutka masala worth about Rs.6,000/-. Hence, the complaint was registered.

¶16

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute a sum of Rs.25,000/- for the purpose of improving and maintaining the Government Schools.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner there was two petitioner involved in this case and the petitioner is arrayed as A2. He further submits that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of pan masala and gutka masala products worth about Rs.6,000/- and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶19

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of theJ case and there is no previous case as against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶20

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thiruvottriyur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶21

(a)if the petitioner failed to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

¶22

(b) the petitioner shall make a non-refundable deposit of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) to the credit of the Chief Educational Officer, Chennai District for the rehabilitation and improvement of the basic needs of the Government Schools in the said District under necessary acknowledgement, without prejudice to his defence before the trial Court and submit the proof of payment of the said amount before the aforesaid learned Judicial Magistrate, who after perusing the challan/ receipt/acknowledgement, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;

¶23

(c)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶24

(d)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;

¶25

(e)the petitioner shall nottamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶26

(f)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

(g)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶29

(h)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

¶30

In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered and the Chief Educational Officer shall submit the necessary proof with regard to the expenditure incurred for the improvement/rehabilitation of the Schools in the District before the Director of School Education as and when such works are completed by utilizing the money as ordered by this Court.

¶31

-sd/-

¶32

05/08/2021

¶33

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶34

TRUE COPY

¶35

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶36

¶37

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I THIRUVOTTRIYUR

¶38

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVALLUR [FOR INFORMATION]

¶39

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, M-6, MANALI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

¶40

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶42

5 THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHENNAI DISTRICT

¶43

+1 CC to M/S. K.THENRAJAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.8212

¶44

APN 19/08/2021

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Gopinath v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopinath v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.K.Dilip Kumar Vs State Rep by

Khader Humayun Vs the State Rep by

Govindasamy Vs State Rep by

Yugaselvan Vs Renuka

A.Raajendher Vs State Rep by

Varatharajan Vs the State Rep by