Allowed

Duraisamy v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC28 Jun 2021CRL OP/11035/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners facing charges under multiple IPC sections and state acts related to public order and harassment. Relying on the fact that the injured victim was treated as an outpatient, the court released the petitioners subject to standard bail conditions including appearance before the magistrate, periodic reporting to police, and execution of

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to be released on bail in event of arrest or appearance within 15 days, conditioned on executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties and adhering to reporting and conduct c

Duraisamy Vs Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.06.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.11035 of 2021

¶6

1.Duraisamy 2.Soundaram 3.Kanagaraj 4.Senthil Kumar 5.Santhosh 6.Sudha ... Petitioners Vs. The State rep. by its The Inspector of Police, Gangavalli Police Station, Salem District. (Crime No.168 of 2021) ... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge on the bail to the petitioners in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.168 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.E.C.Ramesh For Respondent : Mr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R

¶7

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act in Cr.No.168 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶8

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners are alleged to have abused and attacked the defacto complainant.

¶9

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and that they have been falsely implicated in the case.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the injured was treated as out patient.

¶12

5.Considering the fact that the injured was treated as out patient, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶13

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Attur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶14

(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶15

(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

¶16

(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶17

(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶18

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶19

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, ATTUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SALEM(FOR INFORMATION) 3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. CC to M/S.E.C.RAMESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.6840 CRL OP.11035/2021 Date :28/06/2021 RVR 08/07/2021

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Duraisamy v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Duraisamy v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Jayapradha Vs Mariappan

N.Sachidanandam, Vs the Inspector of Police

Dr.K.Rajendrakumar, Vs Chelvi @ Chelvi Raja @ Chelvi

Ramakrishna, A-2, Vs State Rep. by

C.Rajendran Vs State Rep. by Its

Narasimman Vs Inspector of Police