In a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner failed to appear on the date of hearing, resulting in the dismissal of the petition for non-prosecution without any substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of June Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.5063 of 2020
D.JAYAPRADHA [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
1 MARIAPPAN [ RESPONDENTS ]
2 SAKTHIVEL
3 SUBBULAKSHMI
4 STATE BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
W-1, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
THOUSAND LIGHTS,
CHENNAI-600 006.
CR.NO.5 OF 2017.
For Petitioner : M/S.G.V.SRIDHARAN Advocate
For Respondent : MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 498 IPC, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
-sd/25/06/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
W-1, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
THOUSAND LIGHTS,
CHENNAI-600 006.
CC to M/S.G.V.SRIDHARAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.5063/2020
Date :25/06/2021
TA-09/07/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.JAYAPRADHA
MARIAPPAN
STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
