Disposed

S.Elangovan v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC28 Jun 2021CRL OP/10970/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner accused in a traffic offence sought to remit the fine. Court directed Police to facilitate Petitioner's appearance before the Metropolitan Magistrate to pay the fine, dismissing the petition as a matter requiring future compliance.

What did the court decide?

Directed Petitioner to appear before Police on or before 09.07.2021 for facilitation of fine payment at the Metropolitan Magistrate court.

S.Elangovan Vs the State Rep by Its — Madras HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :28.06.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.10970 of 2021

¶6

S.Elangovan

¶7

... Petitioner/Accused

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State Represented by its The Sub-Inspector of Police, J-1, Saidapet Traffic Investigation Wing, Saidapet, Chennai.

¶10

... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to receive the Traffic fine amount of Rs.1000 + 100 (Rupees One Thousand and One Hundred Only) vide Traffic Challan.No.TN43815200925191618, dated 25.09.2020 in TC/16348/2020 against Car bearing Registration No. TN-12 W6112 on the file of the respondent/police.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Arun Kumar

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodharan, Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The petitioner was involved in a Traffic offence on 25.09.2020 and the Traffic Police issued a traffic fine Challan No.TN4381520 0925191618 for Rs.1000 + Rs.100 totally (Rupees One Thousand and One Hundred Only). Though the petitioner is ready to pay the fine amount before the learned XXIII, Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, but he is unable to pay the said amount, since the bench clerk informed that the case sheet is not with the Court. Therefore, the petitioner has come up with the present petition.

¶16

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent submit that the respondent/police are ready to accompany the petitioner as and when he appears before the respondent/police, thereafter taken to the learned XXIII, Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, facilitate the petitioner in remitting the fine amount.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions

¶19

submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the respondent/police, on or before 09.07.2021 after receiving this order copy to remit the fine amount and on such appearance, the respondent/police shall make necessary arrangements to have the case papers available before the XXIII, Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet.

¶20

4.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition

¶21

is disposed of.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS VI)

¶24

//True Copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

klt

¶27

¶28

XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet,

¶29

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police,

¶30

J-1, Saidapet Traffic Investigation Wing, Saidapet, Chennai.

¶31

3.The Public Prosecutor,

¶32

High Court, Madras.

¶33

+1CC to Mr.T.Arunkumar, Advocate, Sr.No.29966

¶34

CRL.O.P.No.10970 of 2021

¶35

BS (CO) K.RK. (22.07.2021)

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Elangovan v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Elangovan v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Vasanthi Vs State by

A.Senthilkumar Vs Elango

P.Sudharsan Vs the State Rep.by

Sivaprakasam Vs State Rep.by Its

Anthony Seviour Vs the Inspector of Police

Stellamary Vs The Additional Director General of police