Petitioner applied for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding offences of affray, criminal intimidation, andsnd threat, citing an alleged false implication. Bail was denied due to six similar pending cases. The application was dismissed.
Bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.O.P.No.10362 of 2021
Pratheepraj
Vs.
State rep by the Sub Inspector of Police, T–5, Thiruverkadu Police Station.
Prayer:
Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioner/ accused on bail in Crime No.154 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Manivelan
For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
O R D E R
The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.04.2021 for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 506(ii), 397 of IPC in Cr.No.154 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner along with the other accused are alleged to have threatened the defacto complainant's son and snatched a sum of Rs.1,800/- from his pocket.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and that he has been falsely implicated in the case.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as A1 in the case and he is having six previous cases of similar nature pending against him.
5.Considering the fact that the petitioner is having six previous cases of similar nature pending against him, I am not https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6.Accordingly, the criminal original petition is dismissed.
-sd/-
14/06/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T-5, THIRUVERKADU POLICE STATION
2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL, CHENNAI.
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S M.MANIVELAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.10362/2021
Date :14/06/2021 MK:05/07/2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to bail given six pending cases of similar nature against him.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pratheepraj
State
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
