Madhan v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras disposed of a second anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 CrPC. Finding no change in circumstances since a previous dismissal order, the Court rejected the petitioner's request for bail in the NDPS case.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Original petition seeking anticipatory bail was dismissed; no bail was granted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.O.P.No.8949 of 2021
Madhan
...Petitioner
Versus
State rep.by The Inspector of Police, P-3, Vyasarpadi Police Station, Chennai. Cr.No.93/2021 ...Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to enlarge the petitioner / accused on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Cr.No.93 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Bhagyaraj For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. side) O R D E R
The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of respondent police for an offence under Sections 8(C) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act 1985 in Crime No.93 of 2021, seeks Anticipatory bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of a previous order dismissing his petition without any change of circumstances.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Madhan
- respondent
State represented by The Inspector of Police, P-3, Vyasarpadi Police Station, Chennai
Coram
M. Dhandapani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court