Allowed

R.Manivannan v. the State Rep by

Madras HC24 Sept 2021CRL MP/9732/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order relaxing bail condition from daily police appearance to weekly appearance on Mondays until investigation completion and charge sheet filing. Other conditions remain unaltered.

What did the court decide?

Daily appearance condition modified to appear before police every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until investigation and charge sheet completion; thereafter appear in trial court on hearing dates.

R.Manivannan Vs the State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of September Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.9732 of 2021

¶7

R.MANIVANNAN [ PETITIONER/ACCUSED ]

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALAPAADY POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT. (CR NO. 407/2021)

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Hon`ble Court in Crl.O.P.No.14751 of 2021 dated 19.08.2021 that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police Station at 10.30a.m until further orders and thus render justice.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.KARAN AND UDAY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of MR.A.GOPINATH Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

Vide order dated 19.08.2021 this Court had granted bail on certain conditions and in one of the condition, the petitioner was directed to appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders.

¶13

This petition have been filed seeking relaxation of the said condition.

¶14

Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, on instruction, submits that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions without fail.

¶15

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer as sought for by the petitioner could be acceded to.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed by

¶18

order dated 19.08.2021 alone stands modified and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police, every Monday at 10.30 a.m. till the investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed and thereafter, shall appear before the concerned trial Court on each and every date of hearing. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

24/09/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VALAPPADY,SALEM DISTRICT.

¶26

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SALEM [FOR INFORMATION]

¶27

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALAPAADY POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.

¶28

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶29

+1C.C. to M/S.KARAN AND UDAY Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.10562

¶30

Order in CRL MP.9732/2021 in CRL OP.14751/2021 Date :24/09/2021

¶31

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶32

CSK 06/10/2021

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Manivannan v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Manivannan v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayakumar Vs State Rep by

Perumal Vs State Rep by

Manikanda Kumar Vs the State Rep by the Inspector of Police

K.Srinivasan Vs Iop Cb v Team Vepery Ch

Im. Sekar Vs Iop Dcb Villupuram

Paripporanam Vs State Rep by