The single judge recalled a non-bailable warrant executed via video conference. Considering the appellant's economic state, the court directed future appearances be made from the counsel's office via video conference, allowing the petition.
NBW dated 19.08.2021 recalled; accused enlarged; conditional appearance via video conference from counsel's office directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.9210 of 2021 in Crl.A.No.7 of 2015
Crl.M.P.No.9210 of 2021 in Crl.A.No.7 of 2015
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.
The matter is heard through "Video Conference".
through video conference.
4. Heard, the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned
Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent.
1/3
Crl.M.P.No.9210 of 2021 in Crl.A.No.7 of 2015
5. Records reveals that in CRL.M.P.No.1/2015, dated
23.06.2015, the accused-appellant was enlarged on bail and directed to
appear before the trial Court on the first working day of every month.
09.09.2021
AT
2/3
Crl.M.P.No.9210 of 2021 in Crl.A.No.7 of 2015
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.
AT
Crl.M.P.No.9210 of 2021 in
Crl.A.No.7 of 2015
09.09.2021
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to recall the non-bailable warrant issued for the appearance of the accused-appellant via video conference.
Appellant
Government
RMT TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
