Allowed

Balaji v. State by Rep., .by

Madras HC28 Jun 2021CRL MP/6503/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court relaxed a bail condition imposed in Crl.OP.6912/2021 under IPC Sections 147, 148, and 436. The petitioner was directed to appear before police for interrogation upon receipt of summons, with the learned Government Advocate noting compliance.

What did the court decide?

Relaxed the bail condition; petitioner directed to appear before police as and when required for interrogation on receipt of summons.

Balaji Vs State by Rep., .by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of June Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.6503 of 2021

IN CRL OP.6912/2021

BALAJI

[ PETITIONER ]

STATE BY REP., .BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, F-5, POLICE STATION, CHOOLAIMEDU, CHENNAI-600 094.

¶12

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Relax the Condition in para 6(b) order dated 15/04/2021 made in Crl.O.P.6912 of 2021 on the file of this Honble Court and pass such further or other orders as may deem fit and proper.

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.C.PAUL KANAGARAJ, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶15

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶16

The Petitioner has filed this petition seeking to relax the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.6912 of 2021 for the offences punishable under Section 147, 148, 436 r/w 120(b) of IPC in Crime No.03 of 2021, while granting bail.

¶17

2.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶18

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed by this Court is relaxed and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police, as and when required for interrogation on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered.

¶21

-sd/-

¶22

28/06/2021

¶23

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶24

TRUE COPY

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO

¶26

1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.XVII, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI.

¶27

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶28

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶29

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, F-5, POLICE STATION, CHOOLAIMEDU, CHENNAI-600 094.

¶30

C.C. to M/S.R.C.PAUL KANAGARAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges

Order

CRL MP.6503/2021

CRL OP.6912/2021

Date :28/06/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶38

TA-26/07/2021

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Balaji v. State by Rep., .by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balaji v. State by Rep., .by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Jayapradha Vs Mariappan

N.Sachidanandam, Vs the Inspector of Police

Dr.K.Rajendrakumar, Vs Chelvi @ Chelvi Raja @ Chelvi

Ramakrishna, A-2, Vs State Rep. by

C.Rajendran Vs State Rep. by Its

Narasimman Vs Inspector of Police