Dismissed

Kumar v. State Rep.by

Madras HC18 Jan 2021CRL MP/6084/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous petition sought bail suspension for the appellant pending the disposal of his main appeal. Appearing only for the Respondent, the Court dismissed the petition, declining to suspend the sentence for the offence. It directed that the main appeal be disposed of as soon as records from the lower court were received.

What did the court decide?

The criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed; sentence is not suspended; main appeal to be disposed early.

Kumar Vs State Rep.by — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Eighteenth day of January Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.VELMURUGAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.6084 of 2020

¶7

IN CRL A.396/2020

¶8

KUMAR [ PETITIONER / APPELLANT ]

¶9

¶10

STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶11

PADALUR POLICE STATION, PERAMBALUR DISTRICT.

¶12

CR.NO.344 OF 2018.

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.A.No.396/2020 on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to enlarge me on bail by suspending the sentence imposed upon me in the Spl.SC.No.29 of 2019 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahaleer Neethi Mandaram Perambalur-Perambalur District, by Judgment dated 22.07.2020 pending disposal of the Crl.A.No.396/2020.

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.A.No.396/2020 on the file of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of NO APPERANCE for the Petitioner and of M/S.M.MADHAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶15

No representation for the petitioner/appellant. This Court is not inclined to suspend the sentence as the case pertains to offence punishable under Section 5(1) r/w 6 of POSCO Act and only inclined to take up the main appeal as early as possible soon after receiving records from the Lower Court. Hence, this Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

¶16

-sd/-

¶17

18/01/2021

¶18

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶19

TRUE COPY

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶21

TO
1 THE SESSIONS JUDGE,
MAHALEER NETTHIMANDARAM
PERAMBALUR-PERAMBALUR DISTRICT.
2 THE SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL PRISON,
TIRUCHIRAPPALLI.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
PADALUR POLICE STATION,
PERAMBALUR DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE SECTION OFFICER
CRIMINAL SECTION,
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
C.C. to M/S OM SAI RAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges
Order
in
CRL MP.6084/2020
in
CRL A.396/2020
Date :18/01/2021
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
cs 19/01/2021

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kumar v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Vijayalakshmi Vs G.Sivangnanam

M/S. Volkswagen Finance Private Limited Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Police

Rafiq Raja Vs P.Jagadeesan

Ravanan Vs State Rep. by

Kotteswaran Vs State Rep by

R.Premkummar Vs P.Hema