Dismissed

Durai v. State Represented by

Madras HC9 Mar 2021CRL MP/4800/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition for suspension of sentence, the High Court directed the registry to remain a remainder to the trial court to submit pending records. Consequently, the pending bail petition was dismissed due to the court's inability to determine the matter without the records.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition for suspension of sentence was dismissed pending receipt of records from the trial court.

Durai Vs State Represented by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Ninth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.4800 of 2020

¶7

IN CRL.A.No.230 of 2018

¶8

DURAI [ PETITIONER ] Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANJANOOR POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT. CR.NO.109/2015.

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to

¶10

(i) To Suspend the Sentence imposed in S.C.No.11/2016 on the file of the Learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court) Villupuram District at Villupuram, dated 08.03.2018 and enlarge the petitioner on Bail, pending disposal of the above Crl.A.No.230 of 2018.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. DR.S.MANOHARAN, Advocate for the petitioner, and of M/S.T.SHUNMUGARAJESWARAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶12

This Court while dismissing the earlier application for Suspension of Sentence filed by the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.10853 of 2018 on 14.06.2019, had directed the Registry to call for the records and prepare typed set of papers and post the matter in the 3^rd week of July under the caption “for final disposal”.

¶13

2.This Court again on 25.02.2021 had directed the Registry to verify whether the records have been called for and the typed set of papers are made ready. It is reported by the Registry that the records have not been received by the Registry from the trial Court.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

3.Registry is directed to send a remainder to the trial Court viz. Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Court) Mahila Court, Villupuram to send the records pertaining to S.C.No.11 of 2016 and prepare typed set of papers and list the matter for final disposal on 07.06.2021.

¶16

3.The Criminal Miscellaneous petition filed for Suspension of Sentence shall stand dismissed.

¶17

-sd/-

¶18

09/03/2021

¶19

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶20

TRUE COPY

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE SESSIONS JUDGE, MAGALIR NEETHI MANDRAM (FAST TRACK COURT) VILLUPURAM DISTRICT. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANJANOOR POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.

¶22

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 4 THE OFFICER INCHARGE CRIMINAL SECTION, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶23

5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, CUDDALORE. C.C. to M/S. DR.S.MANOHARAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶24

Order in CRL MP.4800/2020 in CRL A.230/2018

¶25

Date :09/03/2021

¶26

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶27

TA-25/03/2021

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Durai v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Durai v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Desiga @ Deivasigamani Vs State Rep by

S.Surya Vs the State

K.Karthick Vs the Inspector of Police

Bhuvaneswari Vs the State Rep by

Vinesh Manohar Vs State Rep.by Its

K.Subramanian Vs The Superintendent of police