Partly allowed

Mangilal@Mongilal v. State Rep by

Madras HC25 Mar 2021CRL MP/3642/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted two weeks time to the accused-petitioner to comply with a conditional order dated 05.11.2020. Failure to comply within this period resulted in the automatic dismissal of the anticipatory bail petition.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks time granted to the petitioner to comply with the conditional order; failure to comply results in automatic dismissal of the bail petition.

Mangilal@Mongilal Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Twenty Fifth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3642 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.16808/2020

¶8

MANGILAL @ MONGILAL [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 ] Vs STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLORE NORTH POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.2057/2020)

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extend the time to comply the order of this Hon'ble Court made in Crl.O.P.No.16808 of 2020 dated 05.11.2020.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. G.VINODHKUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and of M/S.S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶11

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to extend the time to the petitioner to comply with the conditional order dated 05.11.2020 made in Crl.O.P.No.16808 of 2020.

¶12

Heard both sides.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is ordered and two weeks time is granted to the petitioner to comply with the conditional order passed by this Court, from the date

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

on which the order copy is made ready. Failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand automatically dismissed.

¶16

-sd/-

¶17

25/03/2021

¶18

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶19

TRUE COPY

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
NO.IV, VELLORE.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
VELLORE [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
VELLORE NORTH POLICE STATION,
VELLORE DISTRICT.
5 THE CANCER INSTITUTE (WIA),
(REGIONAL CANCER CENTRE),
ADYAR, CHENNAI– 600 020
BEARING A/C.NO.149710011005477,
ANDHRA BANK, MADHYA KAILASH BRANCH

¶21

+1 C.C. to M/S. G.VINODHKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.4038

¶22

Order

¶23

in
CRL MP.3642/2021
in
CRL OP.16808/2020
Date :25/03/2021

¶24

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format cs 07/04/2021

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mangilal@Mongilal v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mangilal@Mongilal v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendran Vs the State Rep.by

G.Nagaraj Vs State by

Shalini Vs State by

Saiyad Aatham Vs the State Rep.by

Arul Vs the Inspector of Police

Naveen Kumar Vs State Rep by