Allowed

Sakthivel v. State Rep by

Madras HC18 Mar 2021CRL MP/3317/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 3317 of 2021, the Madras High Court, hearing arguments from counsel for the petitioner and the additional public prosecutor, granted an extension of time to the petitioner to surrender and execute sureties ordered in a previous anticipatory bail order, with failure resulting in automatic dismissal of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Granted an additional two weeks to the petitioner to surrender and execute sureties as ordered; failure leads to automatic dismissal of the anticipatory bail petition.

Sakthivel Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Eighteenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3317 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.640/2021 SAKTHIVEL [ PETITIONER ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SANKARI, SALEM DISTRICT. CR.NO.15/2020.

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to extend the time granted by this Honble Court by another two weeks in the order passed in Crl.O.P.No.640 of 2021 dated 05.02.2019.

¶9

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. T.MURUGANANTHAM, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶10

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to extend the time to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.640 of 2021 order dated 05.02.2021 to execute the surety and to comply with the conditions.

¶11

Heard both sides.

¶12

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is ordered and two weeks time is granted to the petitioner to surrender and execute the sureties as ordered by this Court, from the date on which the order copy made ready. Failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand automatically dismissed.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

4.This Miscellaneous Petition is ordered accordingly.
-sd/-
18/03/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE SPECIAL COURT FOR POCSO
CASES, SALEM
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
SANKARI, SALEM DISTRICT.
C.C. to M/S. T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR.NO.3638
Order
in
CRL MP.3317/2021
in
CRL OP.640/2021
Date :18/03/2021

¶15

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶16

RVR 29/03/2021

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sakthivel v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sakthivel v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Vs State by

Sekar @ Rajasekar Vs the State Rep.by

Guru Vs State Rep. by

Punithavathi Vs State Rep. by

H.Devanathan Vs State Rep by

Deenadhayalanaidu Vs State Rep.by