V.Subramanian v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought anticipatory bail. Counsel requested withdrawal. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Sixteenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.24194 of 2021
1 V.SUBRAMANIAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ]
2 M.RAJASEKAR
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH (ANTI LAND GRABBING), EGMORE, CHENNAI-8.
(CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2021)
For Petitioner : M/S.G.APPAVU Advocate
For Respondent : MR.A.GOKULAKRISHNAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.SUBRAMANIAN
- petitioner
M.RAJASEKAR
- respondent
STATE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court