Allowed

Muthaiyan v. State Rep by

Madras HC26 Nov 2021CRL MP/12210/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought relaxation of bail conditions requiring daily reporting. The court granted the prayer, relaxing the daily reporting condition and substituting it with a requirement to appear as and when required for interrogation, keeping other conditions intact.

What did the court decide?

The condition to appear daily at 10.30 a.m. is relaxed; the petitioner must appear as and when required for interrogation; all other conditions remain unaltered.

Muthaiyan Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Twenty Sixth day of November Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.12210 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.14274/2021

¶8

MUTHAIYAN [ PETITIONER ]

¶9

¶10

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THOOKAMAPAKKAM POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.60/2021)

¶11

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until the trail in Crl.O.P.No.14274/2021 by its order dated 13.08.2021.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S M.SELVAM, Advocate for the petitioner, and of MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶14

Vide Order dated 13.08.2021, this Court had enlarged the petitioner on bail on certain conditions. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking relaxation of the conditions.

¶15

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions without fail.

¶16

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer as sought for by the petitioner could be acceded to.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed on the petitioner by order dated 13.08.2021, alone stands relaxed and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

26/11/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, CUDDALORE.

¶26

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CUDDALORE. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶27

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THOOKAMAPAKKAM POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

¶29

5 THE CHAIRMAN/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST, CUDDALORE.

¶30

+1 C.C. to M/S M.SELVAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.13571 Order

¶31

in CRL MP.12210/2021 in CRL OP.14274/2021 Date :26/11/2021

¶32

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶33

TA-30/11/2021

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Muthaiyan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthaiyan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Prabakaran Vs State by

S.Arvindh Kumar Vs State Rep.by

Kulandaivel Vs State Rep.by

P.Nayagi Vs D.Murugan

Sriskantharaja Vs State Rep by

L.B.Senthil Kumar Vs State Rep by